The process is pretty straight forward. A get-to-know-you call from the recruiter, then a technical round. For technical round, you could expect that you are reviewing a merge request and finding out what are the problems there and write descriptive comments as you will be actually working remotely and async. I am honest to myself and I know I did a great job in that round and actually got my interviewers impressed a couple of times. Maybe there were some stutters in finding the best approach and googling around (you are told you are allowed to) but I did find them and explained the why behind them. If the expectations were for candidates to be super smooth and not even use backspace once, then their slogan of async working is just an irony as you will be having one or two interviewers watching you code over your shoulders! At the end, I was sure that I will be moved to the next step as I resolved their challenge pretty good and had a positive colab with my interviewers, but instead, after a couple of days, I got one of those automated rejection emails with no additional reasonings. I was supposed to receive a feedback sharing forum, which I never did too. I believe they were either in doubt if they want to really hire someone good for that position or it might have been a biased decision based on personal preferences. I am experienced enough to distinguish a bad interview from a good one, and this definitely was a good one. That’s why I got disappointed in GitLab.