I received a phone call. It was mainly a behavioral type of interview. The people were friendly, and it seems like a good fit. Then, I was sent an invite to complete the online assessment at a fixed time in the next 5 days. I went into the interview and had no exposure to ProctorU. Although you have the benefit of being at home while taking a test, the process felt really invasive. The proctor is looking at you through your computer screen the entire time. They don't tell you that you should have a water bottle ready, luckily I had one with me. The interview set up took about an hour to fully work. I had an authentication stage where I had to verify my information with ProctorU. They asked me information about myself which I didn't know they had (old phone numbers/emails/family emails etc). The interview took about 4-5 hours, which I didn't know before hand. 1 section was an ACT/SAT type as others said. 1 section tested your knowledge on learning a new language. They give you a set of rules to learn, and then you answer questions based on all language rules that they have introduced to you. Then, the final part was 4 questions to program. They are questions you can find on leetcode. I would say 2 easy and 2 medium types. You could not compile your code. They also wrote "cs majors must use java/c++, c." Since I had not used any of these languages in a year given that I mostly worked with javascript and python, I used python. I think that any language that the candidate prefers given the list of options should be respected. What about data scientists who use python? I think they have these biases that don't make sense. Then, I was sent a link to complete my rembrandt profile. This too was a test! It tested your personality as well as your ability to answer arbitrary analogy problems that the ACT/SAT discarded less than 10 years ago. Please take a hint from people who make the ACT/SAT and do the same with this section. Overall, I felt that the technology interview process was outdated especially the ACT/SAT/personality type. I don't feel comfortable with any company relying on a personality quiz to hire candidates. The entire interview with ProctorU was a huge time sinker, which the emails from Epic did not warn me about or telling me how ProctorU works. That said, I did appreciate the phone screen prior to the technical interview. If the process was reversed, I would not have done the test. Given that this was an internship interview, it seems as if it is the same caliber of a full-time software developer. Overall, the process could definitely be condensed.