I applied through college or university. The process took 1+ week. I interviewed at Intuit (Rochester, NY) in Feb 2016
Interview
Entered a school challenge to demonstrate coding ability. I was told to bring my laptop to interview in order to showcase some of my favorite projects. I never had a chance to get out my laptop during the interview. I even asked to show my projects three times and was ignored by the interviewer. Proceeded to whiteboard coding, interviewer was on phone texting while I was trying to talk and explain my reasoning about solving the problem. Interviewer incorrectly stated something about HTML5 that I had known from experience. He even opted for a structure that he thought would be "easy to style" with CSS, researching after the fact to confirm my suspicions, no, it would require tremendous amounts of ugly absolute positioning and weird css calculations that are not supported in most browsers. I successfully completed the second problem but had struggled on the first due to lack of knowledge on a specific language technicality. I was told that "Whiteboard is King". What a sad way to recruit talent.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Design a parking garage. Interviewer added constraints without specifying with much detail. I am assuming this was because they were too busy on their phone. Once I fully understood the problem I was easily able to answer the last segment of the question.
I applied online. I interviewed at Intuit (San Jose, CA)
Interview
round 1 OA - SQL, BASH, 1 LC Medium
round 2 Recruiter screen - AI tools, how you use in your work, Behavioural
round 3 take home assignment
round 4 take home assignment review on why you did certain things
round 5 intuit handover
Started off with a coding challenge. Then a 1 on 1 where you are supposed to show the interviewer a personal project. The interview was pretty easy, but the questions were almost all AI related.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
When have you leveraged AI in your work, either personal or professional
I had an initial exploratory screen with a technical recruiter who reached out to me. When I transparently stated my boundaries regarding senior IC leveling to ensure we were aligned, the recruiter became visibly defensive. Instead of navigating the leveling discussion professionally, they expressed frustration, accused me of cutting them off, and suggested I needed to do more homework on the company.
I chose to be transparent to avoid wasting either of our time. It’s disappointing to see a recruiting process that penalizes clear, efficient communication from senior talent, especially when other top-tier tech firms handle these exact boundaries seamlessly.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Exploratory call with recruiter to learn about my background.
there were 4-5 rounds taken by uptimecrew in which they gave us plenty of time and each round was not much of technical which were of uptime dont know anything about final round didnt reach till that