Really long and disjointed process - meeting up to 10 people but for short periods of time. Almost more like speed dating. Questions were repetitive and lacked deep dives; ultimately had to assess what they’re looking for or how to best provide an idea of your fit and skill sets. Felt simultaneously in-depth but very shallow in terms of assessing hard skills such as leadership skills, quantitative, qualitative skills. For the position I was interviewing for it’s not unusual to have to do a quick presentation, for instance; or be probed on leadership style and experience. Follow up is very slow; 2-3 week lag between scheduling each round. Maybe this is how they treat backup candidates, and I was one; and others have much faster experiences? Or they just weren’t in a rush to necessarily add to the team and just wanted to see what was out there. Disappointing experience overall.

Several rounds of interviews starting with the recruiter screening. After clearing that level its was several rounds with potential ICs and Peers. Mine ended with the hiring manager. Most of the interviews were based on a list of questions the recruiter will give the candidate who passes the initial round. While I didn't get the job I thought the process was fair. The feedback was very limited, however, so I have no idea why I was not chosen.