I applied through college or university. I interviewed at S&P Global
Interview
I got a on-campus interview, No behavioral questions. Went through the resume, discussed a little bit about the leadership experiences but not that much. And than a question about how you rate the companies.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The question about how you rate the companies is not a trivial one, you really need to think hard and give the details.
I applied online. The process took 6 weeks. I interviewed at S&P Global in Mar 2015
Interview
1st round: video interview. Pretty standard questions, such as what do you know about S&P and McGraw Hill? Why did you apply for this program? How does this program help you achieve your career goal?
2nd round: two 30-min phone interviews with 2 of their credit analysts. Apart from standard questions e.g. what do you expect from the program? Why you? Why S&P? The interviews were more focused on technical questions. E.g. What is the structure and some of the items on a balance sheet? What are some of the reasons of the Eurozone crisis? If you are a treasurer of a company and you are financing an acquisition, what would you consider?
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Other questions may include, e.g. what would you consider if you need to rate a company?
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at S&P Global in Jan 2015
Interview
I found the offer online and applied before the 2014 Christmas holidays. Early January, I received an invitation to a 15mn phone interview with a campus recruiter the next week. We went through my resume and my reasons for having applied. As I have an experience in credit rating, I have been asked more details about it. I was left with the impression that this step was a bit standardized and somewhat rushed. The next day, I received an invitation to two other back-to-back phone interviews of 30mn each with two different directors for the next week. These interviews were supposed to be only technical ones, but a good third of the time was spent discussing my earlier experience in credit ratings. The level of the technical question was higher than the earlier comments I read on this website let me think it would be, but not excessively so. Most of the technical questions aimed at making me take distance on what I actually did. Although we discussed the next steps, what this specific programme meant for the company and the role in details and that my experience fuelled an interesting discussion, I have not been invited to the next round. The second round of interview was more casual and less technical than expected. I had the impression to discuss with like-minded, more experienced professionals despite the fact that we had covered different industries. I was surprised when the second interviewer asked to conduct the interview in our common mother tongue, rather than English because it would it would otherwise feel somehow absurd to him (which is different from trying to test the proficiency of an applicant's native language). Also, my interviewers were not located in the office where the programme was supposed to take place.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Assume that a regional or or local governmental entity is planning to finance an infrastructure project with debt: what are the criteria that you would you take into consideration to rate this issuance? (Example: a city planning on developing a tramway network). Follow-up question: how would you monitor this rating after the start of the project?