TLDR - Not recommended.
The interview process consists of three stages:
- Initial screening with HR involving typical behavioural questions.
- Coding session.
- Meeting with the CEO.
I completed the first two stages. The HR screening was a standard 1-hour conversation with generic questions (e.g., 'describe the last time you had a conflict at work and how you resolved it').
The second stage was labeled a 'Live coding session.' The interviewer was late and experienced technical difficulties, not being able to use video. The interviewer, who seemed to be a non-technical HR contractor, provided a link to a GitHub repo with a poorly described code challenge. The session felt disorganised, with no clear expectations for the task. It essentially turned into a situation where I shared my screen and tried to decipher a poorly written boilerplate code on my own without any guidance or help from interviewer.
After a month, I received an auto-generated email stating that I didn't pass the stage, with no actual feedback provided.
It's worth noting that many interview and company reviews here are posted within a short timeframe (most of them posted in a single day), leading me to believe they may have engaged in some form of orchestrated positive social media marketing, preventing genuine negative reviews from surfacing.