Process was lengthy but very structured and streamlined. Video call with recruiter, video call with hiring manager, a test and then a half day's worth of video calls with 4 team members. Pros: The recruiter always got back to me when she said she would and they gave feedback after the final round when I wasn't chosen, which I really appreciate. They were flexible when scheduling the final interview, as I had to juggle a full-time job as well. Cons: The copy test was more extensive than I thought it needed to be given it was free labor and an adjacent role to my current one, but I was given ample time to do it. The only red flag was that there was discrepancy throughout on the role's exact title and responsibilities. I asked a few different team members for clarity and they told me different things as far as title and if the role would have direct reports. For example, when I got the rejection, the note had a title that didn't match what the role had been called throughout the process, and one of the defining factors as to why I was told another candidate was chosen was people management experience....but during the interviews, I couldn't get a straight answer as to whether this role would have direct reports. It felt like it was a fluid role they were still defining, which is fine, but that makes it hard for candidates to bring their best in the interviews.