Pros
Compensation (especially STI and LTI) is very competitive. Some teams are great, and most of the work locations are very nice (which is important, given that *some* employees are expected to be in the office 5 days a week without exception).
Cons
There is no hybrid / remote arrangement, but worse, most groups have very little flexibility in general; even personal commitments like doctors appointments, home maintenance, family / school obligations, etc are very micromanaged, regardless of the individuals performance and time management. This con is made even worse by the fact that some groups do not have this issue, and are allowed whatever flexibility they need, because it's technically at "manager discretion" - but it's all about who your management hierarchy is. Overall, leadership has made it abundantly clear that everyone is expected in the office for every working hour, and you must manage your personal life outside of work in a way to accommodate that expectation. This results in a terrible workplace culture for certain demographics, especially any employee who is a primary care giver. Individual contributors don't have a voice or a seat at the table to communicate these issues (no engagement surveys, little opportunity to interface with leadership, etc), and if management and leadership are already aware of them, they seem to do anything they can to ignore or find a scapegoat for this issue. Other cons include frequently changing leadership and management due to turnover, overzealous timelines demanded by leadership, very lean teams, little to no career advancement opportunities, and a serious "this is the way it's always been done" attitude.