employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Interesting Work, Poor Pay - Research Assistant Harvard University Employee Review

3.0
Feb 4, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting research and bright people.

Cons

While the people at Harvard are very bright and the work is interesting, the institution is not ideal. Harvard attracts people who are looking for cutting edge research experience and who need the Harvard brand name to continue on in their own pursuits. Therefore, Harvard knows that it can pay entry level researchers badly and still retain top talent. For instance, my research team has structured my pay so that they can avoid paying me benefits. This means that I cycle between two pay periods--90 days in which I work for 35 hours a week and then 60 days in which I work 17 hours a week. This allows them to classify me as "less than part time" in order to pay me less and avoid providing me benefits. The result is that I make less on an annualized basis than I would make flipping burgers at McDonalds for 40 hours a week, especially when the health insurance benefits from McDonalds are factored in. This creates a situation in which young people of means can afford to be research assistants while young people who do not have family backing must find other work. Harvard's union is supposed to be fixing this problem, but they are worthless and do not have the employee's interests at heart. I cannot wait until I find a position elsewhere where I am paid better and can live a more normal life financially.

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You work with experts from every field possible in science from Mechanobiology to Metallurgy and working as a ML intern along with scientists from different fields gave me a lot of exposure and how to work in a research department.

Cons

One challenge encountered was maintaining a clear focus on training objectives, as the evolving parameters required continuous reassessment of the model's learning priorities. Additionally, the absence of established ground truth for the domain presented a limitation in validating and guiding the approach effectively.

3.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits and paid time off

Cons

In FAS 25% staff layoffs and reorganization expected sowing much worry. Approximately 10% of jobs already cut in year-long hiring freeze

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All