Culture on the Decline - People Team Member Klaviyo Employee Review

2.0
Jan 29, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good base salary, good benefits, including creative ones like unlimited book reimbursement, unlimited PTO

Cons

Culture is on the decline since joining. Strongly dislike the new requirement to come into the office. Lots of employees were hired remote, and were told they would continue to be remote. They are now being asked to come into the office regularly if they live within 50 miles of various offices. Leadership for the most part just ignored the feedback of affected employees who don't want to do it, or feel unable to do it. The company seems to have a hard time keeping senior level leaders in place, and turnover in general is on the rise. Especially not impressed by the new Chief People Officer, who has not done anything to turn the culture around. Not always an equitable place performance wise, becoming more of a place where your performance depends on who your friends are more than how you actually perform.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have really enjoyed working at Klaviyo - my coworkers, management, and internal partner teams are very smart, thoughtful, and really fun people. The office has amazing amenities (incl a gym, golf simulator, immediate access to South Station terminal) and the employee benefits are quite generous. I strongly recommend working at Klaviyo!

Cons

None to report - it’s been great!

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All