Promotions based on tenure, not merit; toxic culture persists - Accounting Leidos Employee Review

3.0
Apr 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Can be treated well by your manager Remote

Cons

So they base promotions on how long you have been with the company and how many roles you know. It doesnt mean you are good at them though. I saw someone get promoted just because they were at the company longer. But guess what? This person wasnt doing parts of their job! It didn't matter as they were at the company longer than others. So others had to clean up their mess! Also it seems bullies get promoted here as they get the job done, and they don't seem to face any major repercussions for their behavior. There is no room for advancement as they restructured the department and so if you want to move up, you better pray someone leaves or retires. Even if you work super hard and try to make things better, it rarely pays off. They make it difficult to get above even a 3 on a review out of 5.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Incredibly welcoming and tight knit community. Everyone works as a team and there is a sense of togetherness. Known schedule for the year including vacation and off days. Rewarding work.

Cons

Flight Service is a 24/7 operation and like all aviation careers, your schedule is based on seniority. The longer you’re with the company the better your schedule becomes but this likely means late or overnight shifts and working holidays.

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All