employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Ohio State University

Engaged Employer

Pros & Cons - Senior Lecturer The Ohio State University Employee Review

1.0
Jun 14, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The retirement plan and insurance are pretty great. Also, there are lots of perks, like access to the gym, which features two Olympic sized swimming pools, saunas, hot tubs, climbing walls, and an indoor track, plus great group classes at a way better value than you'd find outside.

Cons

The salaries are low, you don't get merit raises (in fact "leadership" will go out of their way to make sure you don't, just to keep the budget down) and the whole place is going the way of corporate universities everywhere--maximum profit, minimum instruction, minimum quality, and pretty crappy treatment of employees. My gynecologist is through the school health insurance and she recently told me that literally all of her patients are women who work at OSU and all of them are overworked and underpaid, so much so that it's affecting their health.

Explore other reviews about The Ohio State University

5.0
May 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work is generally pretty easy and follows school schedule

Cons

Pay is generally pretty low

1.0
May 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Gained some experience for a year and then I quit. I became a healthcare traveler and made more compensation in another hospital.

Cons

I was a full time permanent Instrumentation Coordinator 2 (Sterile processing technician) at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and after that quit like everyone else did. Travelers told me to quit being a permanent and get into traveling and that’s exactly what I did. The environment was extremely micromanaged, with SPD leadership constantly watching every move instead of supporting staff or addressing the real operational problems. Bullying and favoritism were common, and concerns brought up by permanent employees were often ignored. Morale was incredibly low because permanent employees were treated as expendable rather than valued. Burnout was constant due to chronic understaffing, unrealistic high expectations, and increasing workloads with little appreciation or support. Turnover was extremely high, trainees and permanent employees were all quitting at a high rate because the stress became unbearable. Which is why it makes sense that 100% of their staff is all travelers. Instead of fixing the permanent staffing crisis, SPD leadership continued to pressure the remaining employees to do more with no support at all. Communication from SPD leadership felt disconnected from the reality of what employees were dealing with every day. The job itself could have been meaningful, but the toxic culture, lack of support, and feeling of being completely expendable made it difficult to stay long term. I would strongly encourage SPD leadership over at Ohio State university Wexner medical center to take accountability in their actions and create a healthier work environment so trainees and permanent employees such as Instrumentation Coordinators stay longer. The constant staff shortage, high turnover of employees quitting, sick calls, FMLAs and having more travelers rather then permanents in both facility’s is a true reflection of what the SPD leadership at The Ohio state university Wexner medical center lacks.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All