Great travel benefits overshadowed by unrealistic Product Manager workload - Product Manager United Airlines Employee Review

1.0
May 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great travel benefits, you can travel on other airlines standy as well

Cons

In DT TechOps, the PO, BA, and PM responsibilities have been merged into one PM role. PMs are now expected to own strategy, requirements, backlog, stakeholder alignment, delivery tracking, documentation, and execution support. This workload is unrealistic for one person, especially across multiple applications and competing priorities. Leadership often holds PMs accountable for delays or gaps, even when the root issue is limited staffing and unclear role boundaries. Instead of hiring dedicated support, more responsibilities continue to fall on the PM role. This creates an unsustainable model that increases burnout and makes it harder to deliver quality

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Caring dependable efficient employee focused

Cons

blah blah blah blah bkah

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All