Pros
Strong compliance culture
West Bend takes IT risk and compliance seriously. Controls were not just documented for audits but actually used to improve security and operations.
Real ownership as an intern
I was trusted with real compliance work like testing SOX and ITGC controls, working in ServiceNow, Saviynt, Splunk, and helping design controls rather than just observing.
Exposure to enterprise-level tools
I gained hands-on experience with tools that are widely used in industry, especially for access governance, logging, and audit support, which translated directly to real-world compliance work.
Cross-functional collaboration
I worked closely with security, infrastructure, audit, and IAM teams, which helped me understand how compliance fits into the broader business and technical environment.
Learning-focused environment
The team was very open to teaching and walking me through the why behind controls, risks, and audit requirements, which accelerated my growth in IT compliance.
Cons
Complex legacy systems
Some systems were older, which made controls and integrations more complex and required extra documentation and compensating controls.
High documentation overhead
Compliance work required detailed evidence and documentation, which could slow things down, especially during audit periods.
Coordination across teams
Resolving issues sometimes took longer because multiple teams had to be aligned, which is common in regulated environments.
Limited automation in some areas
Not all controls were fully automated yet, which meant more manual testing and follow-ups.
Steep learning curve
There was a lot to learn quickly, especially around insurance systems and regulatory requirements, which was challenging early on.