New York Times reviews

3.8

70% would recommend to a friend

(921 total reviews)

Meredith Kopit Levien

71% approve of CEO

75% positive business outlook

New York Times has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 921 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The New York Times employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

921 reviews
4.0
May 10, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The mission. - Tech-wise, can sometimes feel start-up like. New projects are cloud-first (GCP) and most teams have moved to agile. Room for new ways of doing work and rethinking old approaches. - Decently large tech org with a depth of experience. - Lots of opportunity for growth and strong focus on learning. - Strong architecture review board. - Push for more regularization in languages, systems, and production quality. - There are some excellent managers in the organization who are committed to their employee's careers and growth. - Diversity initiatives appear to be having some affect in the tech organization.

Cons

- Feels enterprise-y in a lot of ways: culture-wise, a lot of the tech staff don't live in the City and many teams are incredibly siloed from each other; project-wise, things can move slowly and old projects live forever. - There's a lack of cohesiveness in the org: while engineering has started to move to a product model, Product & PM are still catching up; some teams lack development discipline; communication between teams can feel like pulling teeth. - Some parts of the tech org are understaffed. - Diversity continues to be a problem in the tech organization. - Relationship between the business and the newsroom is still weird.

3.0
Nov 1, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Being in this building and walking through the newsroom just makes you feel like you are a part of something special. The history and the mission is meaningful, and it makes the job feel like it matters. Every one is very motivated by this.

Cons

Even as a software engineer, the amount of meetings you will have to go to is intense. It is sometimes hard to find any time to code. Sometimes you will have meetings on top of meetings. You will have to block off random chunks of time on your schedule so that you can code, but meetings will get booked into them regardless. Other cons are completely team dependent. But generally, if you are on a consumer facing news product team as an engineer, it may be tough. You will be surrounded by competitive, type A coworkers. Priorities are strange and engineers have no voice in the product. Product managers and designers run everything with a tight grip and no flexibility. All your deliverables exist to make them look good and they will ask for unnecessary things constantly. You will be micro managed to death and the politics of interacting with the product team will slowly wear you down. Relations between product and engineering are tense for this reason. Upper management seems to have no interest in remedying this and engineers leave constantly because of it.

2.0
Feb 9, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It's the New York Times, the paper of record, one of the great icons of New York and United States culture and history and still producing amazing journalism. A pretty homogeneously politically liberal workplace, which is is not as easy to find in NYC as one might expect. Extremely PC. You will never hear an inappropriate joke, or any comment disrespectful to religion, race, gender, etc. Extremely diverse, ethnically. Pretty good bonus and 401k matching compared with other tech/media companies. Three weeks vacation + three personal days.

Cons

Digital side is a highly individualistic atmosphere. Engineers are expected to make a name for themselves in hackathons, and I didn't observe sincere camaraderie between others or directed at me from any but a very few people during my time there. There is a culture of overdesign and a love of the status quo, which means you will spend most of your time trying to maintain ridiculously complex systems. Product decisions seem to be based on intuition rather than a careful analysis of data, which is perplexing due to the immensity of pageview and other usage data from the various platforms that is just lying around unused. The result is 200 engineers working on few know exactly what and having who knows what impact on the success of the business. In general, data analysis and data collection are not understood and not highly prioritized there. The workspace itself is gray, dark, lifeless and depressing. Insist on a tour of the floor if you get an onsite interview. There is no process (letter of warning, bad review, etc.) for termination. One day you will simply be informed your employment is over. I observed many totally unexpected terminations of hardworking and talented individuals and no explanation of any substance was ever provided. I've spoken with other former employees and the "ambush firing" is apparently standard practice there. So if you join the Times don't ever assume anything about the security of your job.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 921 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,122 New York Times reviews submitted anonymously by New York Times employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if New York Times is right for you.