Orrick reviews

3.5

67% would recommend to a friend

(391 total reviews)
avatar

Mitchell Zuklie

71% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

Orrick has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 391 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Orrick employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Legal industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

391 reviews
2.0
Nov 21, 2024

Avoid

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Probably one of the best immediate teams I have ever worked on. People enjoyed each other's company and could be counted on to do their part and do great work.

Cons

A group of "mean girls" runs the firm with Mitch as the figure head. Jess Perry has run the marketing team into the ground with a culture built on demeaning anyone who disagrees with her.

2.0
Jan 28, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I enjoyed working with an extremely collegial group of marketing and business development professionals who could speak to the nuance of the work and help their peers.

Cons

Nothing says "this firm is thriving" quite like dueling Glassdoor reviews, right? This once collegial, innovative, and hard-working team has been gutted—both in size and morale—by a thoughtless restructuring led by a partner with no verifiable marketing acumen, zero business development achievements, and absolutely no people management skills. Under this individual’s direction, marketing professionals were unceremoniously removed from their roles without so much as a conversation or input. Decisions about their futures were made by people who had never even spoken to them. Their options? Accept the new role or leave. Experienced professionals with years of expertise were reduced to glorified ticket-takers, simply fulfilling orders. For prospective attorneys considering a job at Orrick, beware: business development support is sparse at best. Most departments are left with just one or two overworked people trying to provide strategic support. If you’re promised otherwise, talk to some of the recently departed partners—or the rainmakers actively documenting this partner's countless missteps in hopes of finally forcing change. Need help with your bio, pitching clients, building your brand, or targeting clients for new work? Good luck. The remaining team members are talented, but there are far too few of them left to make a real impact. Many of them are likely close to giving notice too. If you're a legal marketer, explore literally any other option. Savvy candidates turned down offers once they see the team’s structure and realize they’d be walking into a mess with no meaningful support. Unsurprisingly, there’s been a steady exodus of talent as a result. The few marketers who remain are micromanaged with time-tracking demands—because, after all, "attorneys do it, so why shouldn’t you?" Except attorneys bill separate clients for their time. This is a ridiculous oversight exercise you'd be spared at any other firm. Be warned that the partner behind these changes wouldn’t dream of getting their own hands dirty, so anyone considering a management role within marketing should know they’re signing up to eventually be a scapegoat. This same partner didn’t bother to attend a single meeting to explain the restructuring decisions, instead delegating the dirty work to others. They’re equally spineless when delivering bad news to other partners. Thankfully, some within the partnership are starting to catch on. If you join the team, expect to be handed “playbooks" created by Lean Six Sigma experts—individuals with no actual experience in the work they’re documenting. There are no marketers at the helm here. Finally, let’s talk about the firm’s mindset. Orrick once prided itself on being a "best place to work." But when leadership received constructive criticism, their response wasn’t to listen or improve—it was to downplay the importance of such recognition and focus on "managing (especially associate) expectations." This immature, performative culture thrives on the illusion of niceness. Take the diversity of leadership, for instance: one glance at the photos of those in charge tells you all you need to know about how hollow that claim really is. In short: avoid this sinking ship.

2.0
Sep 1, 2016

Not recommended

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Finding it challenging to identify pros. Benefits are good and offices are well appointed. The lawyers are smart as are most of the staff.

Cons

Terrible leadership team. Incredibly political with next to zero emotional intelligence. No CFO, CMO, or Chief HR Officer, if that's an indication. Lawyers are paid at market prices, but staff positions seem under market, especially for the number of hours staff members are expected to work. Strategic vision not well articulated--the vision that is articulated is not backed with a well thought out plan. Firm touts its core values, but seems to reward those who don't practice them. Morale is low.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 391 Reviews

Glassdoor has 479 Orrick reviews submitted anonymously by Orrick employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Orrick is right for you.