Saviynt reviews

4.0

79% would recommend to a friend

(422 total reviews)
avatar

Sachin Nayyar

86% approve of CEO

83% positive business outlook

Saviynt has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 422 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Saviynt employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

422 reviews
2.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you're obsessed with AI and want to be at the center of an organization actively trying to figure out what AI-first enterprise software looks like, this is genuinely interesting work. The problems are complex, the space is evolving fast, and there's real opportunity to shape things if you have the stomach for it. If you're a seasoned UX person with a strong voice, thick skin, and you thrive in ambiguity and chaos, you might carve out something meaningful here. You need to be the kind of UX leader who can walk into any room and make a compelling, persistent case for why UX matters in the age of AI. If you can influence leadership and keep making that argument without burning out, there's real work to be done here. You'll need to fight for it every step of the way. If you're looking for an organization that understands and supports good design practice, keep looking.

Cons

Design is not a valued function here, and that's not a temporary growing pain, it's structural. Collaboration between UX, PM, and engineering has always been uneven. Design is consistently brought in late, given fewer resources, and expected to execute rather than shape direction. The push toward AI makes this worse. The official message is about embracing the future, but the undertone is adapt or die, with little acknowledgment of what experienced designers actually bring that AI can't replicate. Leadership doesn't understand what UX brings to the table, budget and headcount flow to PM and engineering, and you'll spend significant energy justifying basic design work rather than doing it. There is no mature UX culture to plug into, and no hope of one being built anytime soon. There's also a persistent gap between what leadership says and what they do. They talk about improving, investing in quality, building the right way. In practice, the priority is always speed and short-term delivery. The optimism is real, but so is the pattern. Meaningful change here would require a fundamental organizational reset. You're expected to be based near one of their California offices or travel frequently, which immediately cuts out a huge pool of talented people who work remotely. If location flexibility matters to you, this is not the place. So retention has been a problem. Good people leave consistently, and the organization struggles to find and keep the right talent.

2.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hybrid (3+2) Tech stack Can't think of anything else worth mentioning about this company.

Cons

Poor leadership Toxic work culture Worst designation hierarchy No perks apart from salary

2.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are good managers here. Whether you get one depends on which team you land. Flexible hours. High performers can have real impact and get recognized, if they happen to have visibility with the right people. Politics matter. The company has serious funding and market ambition. If you're genuinely excited about AI and want a company that encourages using it, this could be a good fit.

Cons

- Speed is the only real priority. Leadership talks about quality, but roadmaps, incentives, and timelines tell a different story. Shipping fast consistently wins, even if what ships is barely functional. This isn't new. It's been raised internally for years. Nothing has changed. - Going above and beyond will cost you. If you take initiative to fix something broken, do it transparently, get buy-in, and put in real work, don't be surprised if it gets discarded anyway because a deadline didn't leave room for it. The culture quietly punishes people who try to improve things. Eventually, people stop trying. - The AI push is a contradiction. The company is leaning hard into AI, in hiring, in messaging, in expectations. But the resources provided to actually use AI effectively are a fraction of what the work requires. You're told to do more with AI, then given a budget that runs out well before the month is halfway through. The alternative tools are slower and produce worse results. - Hiring now heavily favors AI experience over fundamental competence. That might show short-term results. But AI doesn't fix broken systems, t produces more output from them, faster. Garbage in, garbage out, at scale. - Decisions get made by people who don't do the work. People removed from day-to-day execution make calls that directly make that execution harder. It shows up in how tools get approved, how timelines get set, how priorities shift without warning, and how other teams often create more friction than help when you reach out. When something goes wrong, the first instinct is to find who to blame, not how to fix it. - The office and hiring strategy doesn't add up. Remote works well for certain roles here. Despite that, there's a push to hire new people close to the office, which narrows the candidate pool and drives up cost. The people making that call aren't the ones doing the work. - Turnover is high for my team A lot of talented people have already left, for exactly these reasons. Who thrives here: If you have a salary you're happy with, you're comfortable following direction without questioning it, and overwork doesn't bother you, you'll probably be fine. If you have standards, if you want your work to actually be good, if you think flagging problems is part of the job, you will struggle. You'll watch good work get discarded. You'll watch people who care deeply burn out and leave. And eventually, you'll leave too.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 422 Reviews

Glassdoor has 433 Saviynt reviews submitted anonymously by Saviynt employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Saviynt is right for you.