Passionate peers but inconsistent supervisory support - Senior Case Manager Dungarvin Employee Review

3.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Your peers are very passionate about supporting our individuals receiving support! Middle and upper leadership are mostly on board with supporting our individuals and the mission.

Cons

Your supervisory experience will vary highly based on your assigned supervisor. Many have direct experience as case managers, but not all do, so may struggle to give constructive feedback and support to their supervisees who do. Executive leadership was mostly disconnected from the case management department and would not connect with our day-to-day very well, so would sometimes make unreasonable asks. Department leadership is usually good at moderating these unreasonable asks, but sometimes these asks will get passed down.

Explore other reviews about Dungarvin

5.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Management at this company

Cons

There are none I can think of

1.0
Apr 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The clients are great and the best part about the job.

Cons

Management and Training Deficiencies Ineffective Leadership: On-site management consistently fails to engage in direct training or oversight. Supervisory duties are frequently abdicated to senior staff members who lack formal training authority, leading to inconsistent onboarding. Lack of Professional Development: Management is unresponsive to internal mobility requests and fails to honor promised compensation structures. Pay increases are routinely delayed or ignored, requiring excessive self-advocacy from staff. Hostile Work Environment: There is a culture of verbal discouragement and professional "berating," particularly when staff members address exhaustion or request standard time off. Operational and Clinical Mismanagement Medication Errors: There is a recurring pattern of medication mismanagement. Rather than addressing systemic flaws, management shifts culpability onto individual staff members when discrepancies are reported. Neglect of Client Care: Management has repeatedly declined to seek necessary medical intervention for clients (e.g., insomnia treatments), leading to unsafe conditions for both the client and the staff member on duty. Dishonest Reporting: Documentation regarding client activities and milestones is frequently falsified or significantly embellished, misrepresenting the actual quality of care provided. Ethical Violations and Safety Concerns Unsafe Behavioral Interventions: I witnessed multiple instances of staff using inappropriate and unauthorized redirection methods, including the use of spray bottles and unnecessary physical force. Inadequate Emergency Support: During overnight crises, administrative guidance was negligent. I was once advised to leave a distressed client outside at 1:00 AM rather than receiving actionable assistance. Retaliatory Conduct: Following my resignation, management engaged in unprofessional behavior by contacting me via personal social media platforms to deliver threats regarding future employability.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All