employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Randstad Enterprise

Engaged Employer

All about who you know - Manager, Talent Delivery Randstad Enterprise Employee Review

1.0
Jan 13, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ability to work virtual. Benefits are standard and flexible somewhat with a scheduling.

Cons

Doesn't matter how well you do. If someone does not like you you're black balled. Don't bother putting in a two weeks either. Upper level management is horrible and unsupportive. You can also expect to work OT in which you're never paid for. You are nothing to them.

avatar
Randstad Enterprise Response
10y
I regret you had a negative experience, but appreciate you bringing it to light. At Randstad Sourceright, we pride ourselves on building an engaging workplace in which every one is highly valued. We would really welcome your specific input on these important topics, as I can assure you that any issues will be immediately addressed. Please reach out to your HR business leader or contact us directly at solutionsinfo@randstadsourceright.com

Explore other reviews about Randstad Enterprise

5.0
Feb 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of mobility and development opportunities for those who prove themselves

Cons

Health insurance is expensive compared to other companies I've worked at

4.0
Jan 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supportive manager. Collegial culture among the immediate team. Autonomy for setting one's own schedule and for coaching content and methods. Lots of mostly good supporting content. Monthly continuing education offerings. Peer-to-peer support and sharing via Google collaboration platform. The satisfaction of making a positive difference in client's (participant's) job search, i.e. fulfilling work.

Cons

1) Quality issues with the offshore job opportunity selection team and (less often) resume writers. As an outplacement coach we needed to stand behind the work of others that we didn't have close relationships with given the number of different team members on those teams and the business model. For two years the issues with offshore were raised to management but nothing improved--the bad quality was an accepted reality. 2) The business model is based on high-volume coaching that at times kept the coaching transactional and surface-level. Business success is based on minimizing coaching hours and resume writing hours per client. Can feel like a factory at times. 3) Chasing after disengaged clients. My guess is that a significant percentage of clients weren't fully bought into the coaching process because they weren't paying out of their own pocket rather their former employer was paying for service. But also had some super clients to work with that were very engaged. A mixed bag.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All