employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Wheeler Staffing Partners

Engaged Employer

Good place to learn recruiting, but has a high turnover rate - RPO Recruiter Wheeler Staffing Partners Employee Review

2.0
Feb 24, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Business casual environment, overall friendly staff, flexibility.

Cons

Minimal training, poor communication, constantly questioning if you will be let go due to a lack of projects, unrealistic deadlines and poor benefits. Know going into the position you can and will be laid off when work slows down, and you will not be paid unemployment. There are people at this company who should be promoted to upper management, and have not been due to nepotism in the company.

avatar
Wheeler Staffing Partners Response
9y
Thank you for your post. There are definitely constant changes in the recruiting industry which affect staffing needs, but we do everything we can to find a spot (either on our team or with clients) for the employees with a good attitude and work ethic that are consistently producing. From my understanding, we haven't had any recent openings in upper management, but please feel free to contact HR with any concerns you may have, as nepotism is a serious accusation that needs to be investigated. I respectfully disagree that we don't take our employees input, because I have personally seen many ideas from employees result in action.

Explore other reviews about Wheeler Staffing Partners

5.0
Mar 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supportive team and great people to work with. Flexible schedule and autonomy in your role.

Cons

Like any sales role, performance expectations can create pressure at times.

1
1.0
Nov 30, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They will hire you if you have no previous recruiting experience. The interview process is very easy; I was offered a job on the spot. Most of the coworkers are nice.

Cons

Context: I was hired for a contract recruiting role, estimated to last around a few months with a potential extension (which was discussed during the interview process). Notes from my experience: 1. Leadership/team lead support changed multiple times during my time here. 2. Turnover appeared high. This contributed to some uncertainty and inconsistency in workflows. 3. Communication style was often urgent and high-pressure, which could increase stress. 4. Performance metrics were emphasized heavily. Feedback was often delivered in group settings rather than privately. 5. Training was minimal and lacked a standardized structure. There was no formal training manual. New hires were expected to perform independently very quickly. 6. Grace for early mistakes felt limited. This was despite new hires still learning systems and expectations. 7. New hires were asked to train other new hires without clear guidance or training resources. 8. Leadership encouraged questions, but responses to questions could feel impatient or inconsistent, especially when access to resources was limited. 9. Time-off requests were not always clearly communicated or acknowledged, making personal scheduling difficult. 10. This is a highly numbers-driven, high-pressure environment. While thresholds were discussed during the interview, actual desired performance was higher in practice, and progress toward these thresholds was emphasized in meetings.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All