employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Wheeler Staffing Partners

Engaged Employer

Amazing Company - Recruiter Wheeler Staffing Partners Employee Review

5.0
Jul 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My time at Wheelers have been nothing but amazing so far. The company culture is great, the CEO truly cares about their employees, amazing co workers, and amazing work environment. Time goes by so fast and it doesn't even feel like I'm at work sometimes. As long as you meet the metrics and show you're working hard, they'll recognize it. Lots of potential commission bonus if you work hard and really push to exceed the weekly metric numbers

Cons

- can get fired without notice due to low work performance - love the hybrid schedule but can definitely be a fully remote job - some higher up can be rude and a pain to deal with - some bad days due to candidates not showing up for their interviews but that's just part of the job

Explore other reviews about Wheeler Staffing Partners

5.0
Mar 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supportive team and great people to work with. Flexible schedule and autonomy in your role.

Cons

Like any sales role, performance expectations can create pressure at times.

1
1.0
Nov 30, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They will hire you if you have no previous recruiting experience. The interview process is very easy; I was offered a job on the spot. Most of the coworkers are nice.

Cons

Context: I was hired for a contract recruiting role, estimated to last around a few months with a potential extension (which was discussed during the interview process). Notes from my experience: 1. Leadership/team lead support changed multiple times during my time here. 2. Turnover appeared high. This contributed to some uncertainty and inconsistency in workflows. 3. Communication style was often urgent and high-pressure, which could increase stress. 4. Performance metrics were emphasized heavily. Feedback was often delivered in group settings rather than privately. 5. Training was minimal and lacked a standardized structure. There was no formal training manual. New hires were expected to perform independently very quickly. 6. Grace for early mistakes felt limited. This was despite new hires still learning systems and expectations. 7. New hires were asked to train other new hires without clear guidance or training resources. 8. Leadership encouraged questions, but responses to questions could feel impatient or inconsistent, especially when access to resources was limited. 9. Time-off requests were not always clearly communicated or acknowledged, making personal scheduling difficult. 10. This is a highly numbers-driven, high-pressure environment. While thresholds were discussed during the interview, actual desired performance was higher in practice, and progress toward these thresholds was emphasized in meetings.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All