Pros
There is always work to be done, so there is never a dull moment. Some folks work remote, which helps with life/work balance. Most of the employees are great people with an incredible amount of drive and skill. The Mountain View office is great.
Cons
Where to begin? After 10+ years so much has changed with this company (as you'd expect). It used to be a company that valued employees and growth. Today, there are simply too many chiefs. And many of those leaders are arrogant, entitled, and self-absorbed (especially the Field leadership). Corporate leadership seems to be snuffed when they rock the boat too much. Gone are the days of pointing out ways to improve the company. Passed my 2, 5, and 10 year anniversaries with the company with no acknowledgment from anyone in the organization (except those I actually told). That sort of lack of appreciation is unacceptable. HR leadership is crass and very authoritarian - they are not the support system the employees truly need. The benefits are okay, but the competition is really beating them out. There are others in the tech space offering 6% and 8% 401k matches. And no, not everyone wants to put their hard earned money into a stock. Yes, it used to be profitable. But what are you going to do now to make up for the stagnation? They will tell you they offer a low 401k match because of the ESPP stock plan, but not everyone is as trustworthy of your finance management as you. Plus the stock buy right now is a loss if you sell short term. The acquisition of Aesynt has been a disaster. The Aesynt team is belligerent, highly political, and overrated. Their resumes speak much higher of their talent than their actual work efforts. And with no applied leadership to get the Aeysnt employees to play nice, they are tearing the Omnicell culture apart. Salaries are okay, but competition typically pays more. Omnicell recently paid their Field employees a few thousand more because they were getting so much flack for underpaying their staff, and also because the hiring managers couldn't fill the positions with such low salaries. The leadership has a budget to hire, but will almost always tell the hiring managers to hire at the lowest level of the salary range to save a few thousand dollars, regardless of the talent of the new hire. And the funny part, all of us were dealt the same hand. It is quintessential "passing the buck", as we were underpaid, and now we are told to underpay others. The greed is rampant. The products are being released way too quickly, meaning rushed testing cycles and half-baked solutions that require more work for the Field, and headaches for our clients. The ship is taking on water, and employees are leaving in droves. Those who are joining lately don't seem to be staying long. Hopefully, the ship will not sink.